This is a blog for a community of students in Sociology 101A: "Sociological Theory," in the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, Fall, 2008.
Friday, November 21, 2008
Baracks Assignment
In this short essay, I discuss the relationship between Barack Obama and the capitalist class.
In State and Revolution, Vladimir Lenin discusses the significant role that the capitalist class plays in the State. Lenin’s theory is applicable today to the recent President elect, Barack Obama. Lenin would argue that Barack Obama’s connection to the capitalist class through the “thousands of threads” is how he became elected (330). Barack Obama did, in fact, possess connections with the elitist capitalist class as he refused public financing for his presidential campaign. In doing so, he did not have a limit on private donations from wealthy capitalists or companies to fund his campaign. He also attended two elite universities, Columbia and Harvard, which maintain close ties with the capitalist class. Lenin would also argue that Obama’s victory exemplifies the false idea that the proletariat influences government and that the state “will carry out the will of the majority of the working people” (320). Obama’s campaign promoted change and he discussed the important role of citizens in carrying out this change. Lenin would dispute this idea because of his definition of the state, “manifestation of the irreconcilability of class antagonisms,” (314). In Lenin’s view, Obama will not act in the interest of all individuals, but instead will act upon the interests of the capitalist class. Lenin is contradictory as he elaborates on the shortcomings of the state, but replaces the present form of government with the dictatorship of the proletariat, another form of government (344). One cannot solve a problem with the replacement of the same thing, with the exceptions of electing representatives that are subject to recall and maintaining the working man’s wages for all (345). Lenin’s argument against the victory of Barack Obama presents valid points to his beliefs about the corruption of the state through the ties with the capitalist class.
This is the informal blog spot for errant questions, random ramblings, and clever musings. For the rest of the semester, we'll use this blog to clarify the work(s) of Lenin, Gramsci and Fanon. Feel free to endlessly post, and don't forget: Theory Rocks!
Will Obama bring the U.S. closer to socialism?
Obama: A Traditional or Organic Intellectual?
Grappling with Gramsci
"The mode of being of the new intellectual can no longer consist in eloquence, which is an exterior and momentary mover of feelings and passions, but in active participation in practical life, as constructor, organizer, 'permanent persuader' and not just a simple orator (but superior at the same time to the abstract mathematical spirit) ..." (Prison Notebooks, 10).
"The relationship between the intellectuals and the world of production is not as direct as it is with the fundamental social groups but is, in varying degrees, 'mediated' by the whole fabric of society and by the complex of superstructures, of which the intellectual are, precisely, the 'functionaries'" (Prison Notebooks 12).
"The superstructure of civil society are like the trench-systems of modern warfare. In war it would sometimes happen that a fierce artillery attack seemed to have destroyed the outer perimeter; and at the moment of their advance and attack the assailants would find themselves confronted by a line of defense which was still effective" (Prison Notebooks 235).
"The massive structures of modern democracies, both as State organizations, and as complexes of associations in civil society, constitute for the art of politics as it were the 'trenches' and the permanent fortifications of the front in the war of position ..." (Prison Notebooks 243).
"... [I]t is obvious that all the essential questions of sociology are nothing other than the questions of political science" (Prison Notebooks 244).
"As long as the class-State exists the regulated society cannot exist, other than metaphorically---i.e. only in the sense that the class-State too is a regulated society" (Prison Notebooks 257).
What did you think of the Rosa Luxemburg film?
Oh No He Didn't: Endless, Evolving and Perplexing Lenin Quotables
"We are in favour of a democratic republic as the best form of state for the proletariat under capitalism" (The State and Revolution, 323).
"Simultaneously with an immense expansion of democracy, which for the first time become democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. We must suppress them in order to free humanity from wage slavery, their resistance must be crushed by force; it is clear that there is no freedom and no democracy where there is suppression and where there is violence" (The State and Revolution, 373).
"The expression 'the state withers away' is very well chosen, for it indicates both the gradual and the spontaneous nature of the process. Only habit can, and undoubtedly will, have such an effect ..." (The State and Revolution, 374).
1 comment:
In State and Revolution, Vladimir Lenin discusses the significant role that the capitalist class plays in the State. Lenin’s theory is applicable today to the recent President elect, Barack Obama. Lenin would argue that Barack Obama’s connection to the capitalist class through the “thousands of threads” is how he became elected (330). Barack Obama did, in fact, possess connections with the elitist capitalist class as he refused public financing for his presidential campaign. In doing so, he did not have a limit on private donations from wealthy capitalists or companies to fund his campaign. He also attended two elite universities, Columbia and Harvard, which maintain close ties with the capitalist class.
Lenin would also argue that Obama’s victory exemplifies the false idea that the proletariat influences government and that the state “will carry out the will of the majority of the working people” (320). Obama’s campaign promoted change and he discussed the important role of citizens in carrying out this change. Lenin would dispute this idea because of his definition of the state, “manifestation of the irreconcilability of class antagonisms,” (314). In Lenin’s view, Obama will not act in the interest of all individuals, but instead will act upon the interests of the capitalist class.
Lenin is contradictory as he elaborates on the shortcomings of the state, but replaces the present form of government with the dictatorship of the proletariat, another form of government (344). One cannot solve a problem with the replacement of the same thing, with the exceptions of electing representatives that are subject to recall and maintaining the working man’s wages for all (345). Lenin’s argument against the victory of Barack Obama presents valid points to his beliefs about the corruption of the state through the ties with the capitalist class.
Post a Comment